Contact Us

Category: Litigation

Criminal and Civil Cases in Thailand

The criminal justice system in Thailand can be difficult to navigate for foreign defendants. Global Affairs Canada cannot protect you from the consequences of breaking local laws abroad or override the decision-making process by the Thai judiciary.

If you are facing criminal charges in Thailand, it is important to hire a competent and reputable criminal lawyer who can effectively represent you. Embassies often maintain lists of recommended lawyers who are proficient in your language and understand the unique challenges that foreigners face.

The Thai Judicial System

In the Thai system, all cases must be initiated in a Court of First Instance. The Courts of Justice are divided into three levels: the Supreme Court, the Courts of Appeal and the Courts of First Instance. Court procedures generally begin with the plaintiff filing a lawsuit. The court then schedules proceedings for witnesses to testify on the case. After witness hearings have been completed, a judgment date is set.

The judicial system in Thailand is largely adversarial, although the courts also operate under an inquisitorial model in certain cases. For example, there are specialized courts for corruption and misconduct, which function under an inquisitorial model. These specialized courts were established under the Act Establishing Specialized Courts for Corruption and Misconduct Cases B.E. 2559 (2016) to expedite the adjudication of such cases.

Judges in Thailand must follow strict guidelines for maintaining a high level of impartiality and independence as stipulated by the Constitution. Judges must also adhere to a code of ethics and face disciplinary action for any violations of this law.

The jurisdiction for civil cases involving immovable property is based on the location where the cause of action arises or the defendant resides. However, the courts have the power to transfer cases from lower levels of court to higher-level courts if they have territorial jurisdiction over them. It is also common for judges to conduct hearings via video conference for witnesses that are located outside the courtroom or abroad, in order to support judicial efficiency and improve access to justice.

Case Management

The judicial process in Thailand is known for being lengthy, creating uncertainty and inconvenience for businesses and individuals. This is why the government has introduced the Timeframe for Judicial Proceedings Act, B.E. 2566 (2023), which sets clear timeframes for each stage of a case in the Court of Justice.

The Thai judicial system is adversarial, meaning that opposing advocates represent their clients’ cases before a judge. However, a few courts—including the Administrative Court, Labor Court and Constitutional Court—operate under an inquisitorial model.

At the investigative hearing, the court will examine whether the case has merit and is eligible to continue for a trial. The judge will also question witnesses. If the court finds that there is sufficient evidence to proceed with the case, it will issue a summons to the defendant.

In criminal cases, the plaintiff can choose to bypass police and file a private prosecution directly with the court. The Court of Justice will then hold a preliminary “investigative” hearing to determine whether the complaint has merit and should be accepted for a full trial. If the court rejects the complaint, it will dismiss the case. In civil cases, the plaintiff can opt to participate in mediation before filing a complaint. If no resolution is reached through mediation, a court will schedule hearings to determine the issues for trial and set witness hearing dates.

Preliminary Hearings

When a person bypasses the police and prosecutor to bring a criminal case against another individual directly to the courts, Thai law requires that the court conduct a preliminary “investigative” hearing to determine whether there are grounds for prosecution. The court may dismiss the case if it is of the opinion that there are no grounds for a trial.

In a civil matter, the court can also encourage parties to resolve the case through court-supervised mediation. If no resolution can be found through mediation, the judge will schedule proceedings to identify and resolve issues in dispute, as well as set dates for witness hearings where both parties can present their evidence.

A judge will then consider all the evidence presented at these hearings and determine if the case should continue to trial or be dismissed. It is important to have a skilled and seasoned lawyer to prepare your defence, so you can prevent surprises and put yourself in the best position to protect your interests.

The use of technology in the courtroom is becoming increasingly common in Thailand, with many judges allowing witnesses to testify via video conference. This has proven to be efficient and is particularly useful when witnesses are outside the country or cannot attend in person. In addition, the judicial system has implemented a number of online platforms to allow for quicker and easier submissions of claims and pleadings.

Trials

As in other common law jurisdictions, trials are conducted by judges and not juries. It is the responsibility of a judge to decide whether the defendant committed the crime and, in the case of a guilty verdict, to determine sentencing. A judge is also responsible for ensuring that the case is considered and adjudicated properly, including that the evidence has been properly presented.

In Thailand, a trial court must follow certain rules when presenting evidence. For example, witnesses must give their testimony in the Thai language and, if necessary, an interpreter must be provided. Also, the law stipulates that the investigator or prosecutor must provide a transcript of the witness’ statement to the defendant and any documents supporting it.

The basic laws that govern civil and criminal cases in Thailand are contained in the Civil and Commercial Code, Penal Code, and various official Acts. Other offenses that carry punishments are found in a number of additional legal codes and statutes, including the Computer Crime Act, which carries criminal penalties for activities such as theft of data and unauthorized access to a computer system.

As a signatory of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Thai government is required to uphold basic fair trial rights for its citizens and visitors. However, the junta’s ongoing military trials of civilians and retention of unfettered police powers are contrary to international legal standards.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Dispute Resolution in Thailand

Businesses can get entangled in disputes that require resolution through the Thai legal system. Disputes come in different forms, such as debt collection or unpaid invoices that result in commercial disputes; disagreements between shareholders leading to shareholder disputes; and consumer disputes.

Dispute resolution options in Thailand provide an accessible and unbiased mechanism for settling disputes. These include conciliation, arbitration and litigation through the courts.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a mechanism for resolving disputes outside the traditional judicial system. ADR includes a variety of mechanisms, including mediation, arbitration, and conciliation. Thailand has a strong legal framework for ADR and is a member of several international agreements that help bolster its credibility as an ADR center.

ADR has been a powerful tool for reducing the backlog of cases in Thai courts, where cases can be litigated for years before they are finally disposed of. Judges have the option to refer cases for conciliation during a trial or at any time after the court has rendered a judgment. A judge may also appoint a conciliator to convene a conciliation session with the parties.

The key to a successful Thailand dispute resolution process is finding a venue that provides a comfortable and private setting for all involved parties. The location should be easily accessible and close to public transportation or major thoroughfares. Ideally, the location should be able to provide a space where parties can meet with their attorneys without disrupting their schedules or interrupting their business operations.

Moreover, the location should have sufficient parking to accommodate all parties’ vehicles. This is especially important if the proceedings will take place over multiple days and evenings. In addition, the facility should be well-equipped with modern facilities and equipment.

Litigation

Litigation is the most traditional means of dispute resolution in Thailand. It involves a formal process in which both sides present their cases to a judge or jury, and the court makes a final decision based on the evidence presented.

Whether your business faces a dispute with an employee, a regulatory matter or a legal battle with another company, it’s important to understand how the litigation process works in Thailand. An attorney can provide tailored legal advice, advocate for your best interests and guide you through the complexities of the Thai legal system.

Litigation proceedings are typically complex and time-consuming. The courts are overwhelmed by a high volume of cases, and it can take years to reach a conclusion. Moreover, litigants must bear substantial legal costs, and the court can make nominal costs orders that only result in a fraction of actual costs being recovered.

In some industries, such as banking, finance and technology, arbitration has become a preferred mode of dispute resolution because it is cost-efficient and faster than litigation. However, commercial disputes still frequently arise before the Thai courts. Additionally, employers with international businesses face labour-related issues that require careful consideration of foreign employment laws and compliance concerns alongside local cultural considerations. This can result in a significant amount of legal expense and risk to the business.

Conciliation

While litigation is the traditional form of dispute resolution in Thailand, it typically takes a long time and can be generally intimidating and hostile. This is why it might be beneficial for parties to opt for an alternative dispute resolution method like conciliation instead.

Under the Civil Procedure Code (“CPC”), conciliation is provided as an option for settlement of disputes in certain cases such as labour disputes and general civil litigation. It is also possible for a judge to require the parties to participate in an in-court conciliation before proceeding with trial.

Conciliation is not a binding dispute resolution process in Thailand and cannot be enforced as an award, but it is often seen as a quicker and more cost effective way to resolve a dispute. It is also an effective way for companies to preserve their business relations and avoid the potential for a costly legal battle.

In a conciliation process, the disputing parties meet with a neutral person known as a conciliator to discuss their dispute and attempt to reach an acceptable solution. The conciliator is not required to provide an impartial judgment and will only consider what the most likely outcome would be if the case were tried in court. The conciliation process will usually include witness hearings and a final judgment hearing, though some cases may be settled without a trial taking place.

Arbitration

Increasingly, foreign claimants and defendants are selecting arbitration as a means of dispute resolution in Thailand to reduce the risks associated with traditional court proceedings. This is particularly evident in the oil & gas and infrastructure sectors, where the choice of arbitration may be dictated by contract or the requirements of local law.

Litigation before Thai courts is still common, with cases often taking years to resolve and significant costs involved for both parties. In an effort to streamline the judicial process and reduce its backlog, the courts have adopted mediation as part of their procedures.

During proceedings, the court will usually arrange meetings with disputing parties to set the schedule of the case, decide on evidence and procedure matters and officially designate a tribunal. In cases involving multiple claims, the court may also, at the request of either the plaintiff or the respondent, order the claims to be tried separately.

Arbitration hearings take place in a private setting, and all information, evidences, statements and arguments are kept confidential. This is a major advantage of the arbitration process, particularly for public figures or businesses that wish to maintain their reputation. It is also possible for parties to choose an arbitrator that is specialised in their subject matter, which can be helpful to speed up proceedings and provide a more thorough and accurate decision.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Trade Disputes in Thailand

Commercial disputes can jeopardize business operations and profitability. Understanding how to resolve trade disputes in Thailand is a critical component of doing business in the country.

Arbitration is similar to a trial, but it takes place outside the court system. Parties select an arbitrator or panel to hear evidence and arguments and make a binding decision called an arbitral award.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

In response to the growing volume of disputes in Thailand and to mitigate against overburdened court systems, the government has embraced Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a practical adjunct or substitute for traditional litigation. ADR programs, particularly court-annexed mediation, have proven highly effective in reducing case backlogs and speeding up the time to case resolution.

In arbitration, parties choose an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators to hear their case, review evidence and arguments, and then make a binding decision called an arbitral award. Arbitration is often quicker, less expensive and more predictable than a trial. Arbitral awards are also generally enforceable both locally in Thai courts and internationally.

The disputing parties may agree to select the governing law in their Thailand dispute resolution agreement, in which case the arbitral tribunal will decide the dispute in accordance with that law. However, if the dispute resolution agreement does not expressly designate a governing law or legal system, the arbitral tribunal shall determine the applicable law in a reasonable and fair manner.

The disputing parties will meet and negotiate to establish a schedule for proceedings, decide on evidence and procedure matters, and officially designate the arbitral tribunal. If the disputing parties do not settle, the arbitral tribunal will be responsible for conducting a conciliation proceeding in accordance with the Rules on Alternative Dispute Resolution Online Proceedings B.E. 2563 (Thailand) and the THAC Code of Conduct.

Arbitration

As a means of dealing with trade disputes, arbitration involves the submission of a dispute to an arbitral tribunal. This process is similar to that of a trial, and the tribunal will review evidence, listen to arguments and make a binding decision called an “arbitral award”. Arbitration offers several advantages over litigation. It can be less expensive, more timely and provides for a greater degree of confidentiality. In addition, it is generally enforceable both in Thailand and abroad.

In the case of a domestic arbitration award, parties must comply with its provisions and, if they do not, may apply to a Thai court for an order to enforce the award (similar to how a judgment is enforced under a civil claim). In the case of foreign awards, enforcement must be achieved in accordance with relevant conventions such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), INCOTERMS, Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits and other governing treaties and conventions.

The court procedures in Thailand involving trade cases usually begin with the plaintiff filing a complaint. The court will then schedule proceedings to determine the issues for trial and set dates for witness hearings where both the plaintiff and the defendant offer their evidence. Once the hearings are completed, a date will be scheduled for the judgment hearing.

Mediation

In Thailand, disputes can be resolved through arbitration and mediation. Mediation involves the assistance of a neutral third party to settle the dispute. The parties may designate their own mediator or they can make use of the services of the Thai Mediation Center. The mediation process is usually less formal than a court case and the costs are much lower.

In addition, mediation is more flexible and quicker than a trial. Furthermore, the results of a mediation can be binding. It is important to understand the differences between mediation and arbitration. A good understanding of the dispute can help you determine which solution is best for your business.

Litigation is an adversarial process that can take years to reach a resolution. The courts’ caseload often exceeds their capacity, leading to lengthy delays in processing cases. However, successful litigation can set legal precedents and offer significant leverage in future negotiations.

The government of Thailand has encouraged alternative dispute resolution, including conciliation. Conciliation is used in the Civil Courts of First Instance in Bangkok, the Civil Court in provincial centres, the Family and Juvenile Court, and the Central Labour Court for cases involving labour disputes.

Litigation

In Thailand, the prevailing party in a civil dispute is generally ordered to pay costs to the opposing party. This may include the costs of lawyers and expert witnesses, though there is a substantial amount of discretion in this area. It is possible to seek advance court costs in some instances.

Litigation is a slow and expensive means of dealing with trade disputes in Thailand. This is exacerbated by the fact that Thai courts are generally overburdened with cases and lack sufficient staff and resources to deal efficiently with caseloads.

As a result of these limitations, it is often difficult to get a case before a judge or other competent authority within a reasonable timeframe. This can also cause significant delays in the enforcement of judgments, which can further prolong the length of a trade dispute.

In terms of international trade, a judgment of a foreign court in a civil dispute is generally not enforceable in Thailand unless the parties specifically agree to enlist the jurisdiction of Thai courts and/or unless the case falls under an international convention to which Thailand is a party (e.g. the New York Convention 1958, the Geneva Convention 1927).

Chandler Mori Hamada’s litigation team has extensive experience representing local and multinational clients in all kinds of litigation matters in various Thai courts including the Administrative Court, Bankruptcy Court, Commercial Court, Labor Court, Intellectual Property and International Trade Court, and Taxation Court. We have handled numerous trade dispute cases in a wide range of industries and sectors including energy, infrastructure, construction, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, industrial machinery, insurance, information technology, telecommunications, and international business.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Labor Disputes in Thailand

The nature and frequency of Labor Disputes in Thailand are influenced by a broad range of economic, legal, and social factors. This content explores the legal framework, dispute resolution mechanisms, and current trends and challenges.

It is important for both employers and employees to understand Thailand’s employment laws, including wages, working conditions, and termination procedures. This will help to prevent disputes and resolve them quickly when they do arise.

Disputes between employers and employees

Employers and employees can find themselves in disputes over a variety of issues, including wages and working conditions. It is important for both parties to understand their legal rights and obligations in order to avoid such conflicts. If a dispute does arise, both parties can resolve the issue through mediation or arbitration. This method of Thailand dispute resolution is usually less costly and faster than a trial.

In addition, both parties can agree to submit the dispute to a labor dispute committee for investigation and resolution. This committee will consist of representatives from both the employer and employees, who will work together to find a solution. Alternatively, either party can choose to file a claim with the Labor Court, which has jurisdiction over labor-related claims.

Disputes can also occur when the terms of an employment contract are violated. It is crucial for both parties to carefully review their contracts before signing, and to keep records of all payments and correspondence related to the agreement.

A growing emphasis on workers’ rights has led to increased enforcement of labor laws and stricter scrutiny of employers’ practices. Recent changes to Thailand’s labor laws have aimed to improve employees’ financial security by increasing statutory severance pay and extending the period during which an employee can be placed on “garden leave.” A 2024 Ministerial Regulation further addresses tax implications by introducing new provisions that will provide greater flexibility for outsourced workers and contractors.

Disputes between employees and management

Labor disputes are a vital component of the workplace, and understanding how to resolve them can help businesses maintain productivity. In Thailand, the legal framework, social dynamics, and economic conditions all play a role in shaping the nature and resolution of these conflicts. Disputes between employees and management may involve a variety of issues, including working conditions, wages, and benefits.

The first step in resolving disputes is often direct negotiation between the parties. If this fails, mediation by a neutral third party can be sought. This process is faster and less formal than litigation, and aims to facilitate a mutually acceptable agreement. If mediation is not successful, the dispute can be escalated to the Ministry of Labour, which will arbitrate the issue.

In addition to arbitration, the ministry also provides alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. These can be useful for resolving disputes that are difficult to litigate or require specialized expertise. In most cases, these methods are more efficient and cost-effective than litigation.

It’s important for employers to ensure their workers are properly classified, as this can prevent misunderstandings and prevent the misuse of employee rights. For example, if an employee is misclassified as independent contractor, they may not be eligible for certain benefits. In addition, it’s important to keep in mind that if an employer wants to terminate an employee, they must provide proper notice and pay severance compensation depending on the length of service.

Disputes between employees and labor unions

Labor disputes often arise as a result of disagreements over wages, working conditions, and other employment terms. These conflicts can affect workplace harmony and productivity. Understanding the legal framework and dispute resolution mechanisms in Thailand can help employers and employees avoid labor disputes.

The Ministry of Labor’s Department of Labour Protection and Welfare (DLPW) and the Labor Court are responsible for enforcing labor laws and adjudicating disputes. They can resolve issues involving wages, overtime pay, relocation of work premises, and severance payments. However, bureaucratic delays can prolong these processes and increase frustration for both parties. In addition, Thai culture has a strong emphasis on maintaining harmony and avoiding confrontation, which can hinder open discussion of labour issues and the reporting of grievances.

Labor disputes can also arise from violations of employment contracts, such as the failure to provide required benefits or the breach of an employee’s duties. Additionally, disputes can occur over the fairness of a termination process or the adequacy of severance pay. Both employees and employers can benefit from seeking the advice of a labor lawyer who is knowledgeable about Thailand’s legal system and dispute resolution processes. A lawyer can assist with negotiation, mediation, and legal proceedings, and can ensure that the interests of both parties are protected. In addition, a labor lawyer can help prevent conflicts from arising by advising both parties on compliance with the law and good practices.

Disputes between employees and government agencies

While Thailand’s labor laws provide a strong legal framework for protecting employee rights, there are numerous factors that can influence the nature and resolution of labor disputes. These include wage regulations, working conditions, and conflict resolution mechanisms. Understanding these factors is essential for both employers and employees in navigating and resolving conflicts effectively.

For example, minimum wage regulations in Thailand are determined at the national level, but wages vary regionally to account for local economic conditions. This dynamic requires close monitoring to ensure full compliance and equitable pay for all workers. Additionally, workers in the informal sector are more likely to be unaware of their legal rights and the mechanisms available to address grievances, which can lead to underreporting or unresolved conflicts.

Moreover, there is often a power imbalance between employees and employers in many sectors, especially in low-skilled industries with weak labor unions. This can create a culture of fear in the workplace and discourage workers from raising their concerns or taking action against their employer.

If mediation or other dispute resolution methods fail to resolve a dispute, parties can escalate the matter to the Labor Court, which hears cases related to discrimination, unfair dismissal, and violations of labor laws. The process is expedited and less formal than general courts. Nonetheless, it is still advisable for both parties to seek legal representation.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Breach of Contract in Thailand

Contracts weave the fabric of commercial transactions in Thailand binding parties to their contractual promises. Understanding the legal framework, types of breaches and available remedies is essential for businesses and individuals.

There are several types of damages for breach of contract in Thailand, including general or actual damages and consequential damages. There are also stipulated or liquidated damages, which are pre-agreed amounts specified in the contract.

Definition

Thailand’s economy thrives on contracts, agreements that bind parties to fulfill specific obligations. Unforeseen circumstances and deliberate actions can jeopardize these contracts, creating losses for both businesses and individuals. Understanding breach of contract in Thailand, its legal framework, and remedies can help you protect your interests and business goals.

The Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand provides the foundation for contractual relationships, describing the elements required for a valid contract. These include offer and acceptance, consideration, capacity of the parties, and a lawful purpose. The enforceable terms must also clearly define the rights and duties of the parties, ensuring that both parties understand what is at stake.

A breach of contract happens when one party fails to fulfil their contractual promises, leading to the immediate consequences outlined in the contract or under Thai law. This can be an actual breach or anticipatory breach, depending on how the non-breaching party is informed of the breach and their ability to take action.

Remedies for a breach of contract in Thailand can include compensatory and consequential damages, specific performance, or contract cancellation. Damages involve monetary compensation aimed at restoring the injured party to the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred, covering direct and foreseeable financial losses. In many cases, these damages align with what the court refers to as stipulated damages or liquidated damages set out in the contract.

Remedies

Contracts weave the fabric of commerce in Thailand binding parties to their responsibilities and fostering trust in business transactions. Understanding the legal framework, prevalent forms of breach, and available remedies can help individuals and businesses effectively navigate potential contract disputes.

Damages, specific performance, and rescission are the most common legal remedies associated with breach of contract in Thailand. Damages involve monetary compensation that seek to return non-breaching parties to their positions prior to the breach, covering financial losses incurred. This includes compensatory damages, consequential damages, and stipulated or liquidated damages (pre-agreed amounts established when entering the contract). Punitive damages are rare in Thailand but serve to punish the violating party and deter future breaches.

Specific performance requires a court order compelling the breaching party to fulfil contractual obligations as originally outlined in the contract. This remedy is often applied when monetary damages are insufficient to address the issue. It can also be used when the breach is of such a nature that continuing with the contract would be impractical.

If these legal mechanisms are ineffective, mediation and arbitration are alternative methods of Thailand dispute resolution that typically involve a neutral third party facilitating discussions between the parties in an attempt to reach a mutually acceptable solution. When these methods fail, litigation can be pursued through the Thai courts.

Prevention

In contract law, the best way to prevent a breach of contract is through careful contract drafting, review, and performance. In the event a dispute does arise, prompt action and consideration of alternative dispute resolution methods can often prevent the need for lengthy legal proceedings and costly litigation.

Remedies for breach of contract are outlined in Thailand’s Civil and Commercial Code (CCC). The most common remedy is damages, compensating the non-breaching party for financial losses suffered as a result of the breach. Other remedies include specific performance, which forces the breaching party to fulfil contractual obligations and rescission, cancelling the contract returning both parties to their pre-contractual positions. Punitive damages are rarely awarded in Thailand, but may be imposed in cases of gross negligence or fraud.

To mitigate the risk of a breach, it is important to have clear, comprehensive contracts that are thoroughly reviewed and well-drafted by an experienced lawyer. It is also advisable to include force majeure clauses in contracts, which excuse parties from their contractual obligations due to extraordinary circumstances beyond their control.

In addition, it is important to keep thorough records of all communications and transactions related to a contract to ensure compliance with Thai law in the event of a dispute. Finally, engaging local counsel can help navigate the complexities of Thai contract law and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Dispute resolution

Contracts are the backbone of business transactions and relationships, providing a clear framework for parties to define their rights and obligations. When contracts are breached, it can lead to serious consequences, including monetary compensation and legal actions. Understanding Thailand’s legal framework for contracts, common types of breaches, remedies and dispute resolution can help individuals and companies mitigate the risk of contract disputes.

Disputes can be resolved through negotiation, mediation or arbitration. Mediation involves a neutral third party who facilitates discussions between the parties to find a voluntary solution without involving the courts. Arbitration is a binding process where a neutral arbitrator or panel hears arguments from both parties and makes a decision called an “arbitral award”. Aside from being cheaper and faster than litigation, arbitration awards are generally enforceable in Thai court.

In cases where a settlement is not reached, a civil lawsuit may be brought in order to enforce the terms of a contract. However, this method can take a long time and should only be pursued after informal methods like a demand letter have failed. Depending on the case, a non-breaching party can seek damages for the cost of performing the contract or any losses and injuries caused by the breaching party. It is also possible to seek specific performance, which is a court order requiring the breaching party to fulfill their contractual duties.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Personal Injury Claims in Thailand

Personal Injury Claims in Thailand typically involve compensation for wrongful actions. Compensation covers medical bills, expenses and compensation for lost work – including future earnings.

Globalization appears to have transformed conceptions of injury and compensation in northern Thailand in two significant ways. The first change involves the relationship between state law and customary laws of sacred centers.

1. Medical Treatment

Personal Injury Claims are part of the legal system in Thailand that addresses individuals who have suffered harm due to the negligence or wrongdoing of others. Whether it is from a traffic accident, medical malpractice, or a workplace incident, victims are able to pursue compensation for damages incurred such as loss of earnings, ongoing treatment expenses, and pain and suffering.

The legal framework for such claims is rooted in the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (CCC). A claimant must prove negligence to receive compensation. Proving negligence can be difficult since it requires a clear demonstration of duty, breach, and direct causation to the victim’s injury. In addition, foreigners may face difficulties due to language barriers and cultural differences.

In addition, it is important to note that a civil case for personal injury must be filed within one year after the wrongful act occurred. For this reason, it is important for foreigners who have sustained injuries in Thailand to contact a lawyer as soon as possible. Foreigners can also sign a power of attorney to have a local lawyer file their claim on their behalf. However, it is usually necessary for the injured party to appear in court on at least one occasion to testify in person.

2. Settlements and Expenses

Bringing a personal injury claim in Thailand necessitates a thorough grasp of the legal system, meticulous documentation of the facts, and prompt and experienced legal representation. Moreover, a successful outcome may be greatly increased by a symbiotic relationship with attorneys who work on a contingency basis and are paid only if they win their client’s case.

According to Thai law, anyone who wilfully injures another’s body, life, health, liberty, property, or rights is bound to compensate the injured party for their losses. Compensation includes payment of medical expenses, restitution of damaged property, and remuneration for lost income both past and future. In the event of death, heirs may also claim funeral and essential burial costs as well as support for those legally entitled to it.

This article aims to examine conceptions of injury and compensation in Thailand by connecting them to notions of legality associated with particular social landscapes. It suggests that a reassessment of these relationships is critical in the face of rapid social transformations, since they affect how state law interacts with and responds to nonstate legal orders.

3. Physical Appearance

Many foreign tourists visiting Thailand experience accidents or injuries that occur while staying at hotels and other tourist establishments. These incidents are considered personal injury claims and must be filed as such in accordance with Thai law. It is important that any claim for compensation is filed within a year of the incident, a period known as the statute of limitations. Generally, most law firms will have someone on staff that specializes in these types of cases.

Typically, courts will award damages that attempt to put the injured party back in the position they were in before the accident occurred, including expenses, loss of future earnings and any other tangible losses. Intangible losses such as pain and suffering may also be awarded, though at a much more restrained level than in some other countries.

Generally, the injured party must physically appear at all hearings in court. However, it is possible for a foreigner to file a claim in Thailand without being present by signing a power of attorney to have a lawyer file on their behalf.

4. Statute of Limitations

The laws of Thailand stipulate that any person who wilfully or negligently unlawfully injures another’s body, life, health, liberty, property or rights is bound to make compensation. This compensation generally aims to place claimants back in the position they would have been had the injury not occurred, including expenses for medical treatment and damages for loss of income past and future.

To prove personal injury, the plaintiff must show that the defendant breached their duty of care, that this breach caused the injuries or loss and that the victim suffered actual harm or loss as a result. This usually requires proof of negligence, although in some cases (such as product liability or dangerous activities) strict liability may apply and it is not necessary to establish negligence.

It is important to act promptly in the aftermath of an accident or injury. A successful legal case largely hinges on meticulous documentation and prompt legal assistance. A good lawyer can also assist in discerning whether a case falls under civil or criminal law, as well as the appropriate court or authority.

5. Legal Assistance

Pursuing a personal injury claim in Thailand requires a thorough comprehension of the legal framework and careful consideration of practical issues. From traffic accidents to medical malpractice, injured parties may pursue compensation for the physical and emotional harm they experience due to others’ negligence.

The legal framework for personal injury in Thailand is established under the tort law, as stipulated by Section 420. The statute stipulates that a person who commits a wrongful act that causes death or bodily harm can be sued by the injured party for compensation.

However, the burden of proof is heavy as the injured party must prove that the wrongful act led to the damages. Furthermore, compensation is often calculated based on actual costs that can be proven with receipts and evidence such as medical bills, repair receipts, and evidence of loss of income. Additionally, awards for intangible losses such as pain and suffering are typically less generous than in Western countries. The best approach to pursuing a personal injury claim in Thailand is through engaging a professional lawyer who can assist in navigating the legal system, gathering comprehensive evidence, and securing fair compensation.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Medical Malpractice in Thailand

Medical Malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider breaches their duty of care to the patient and this breach causes injury or death. Patients who believe they have been victims of medical malpractice are entitled to compensation.

Societies want their healthcare professionals to be motivated to engage in best practices and occasionally take calculated risks with the welfare of their patients as the paramount concern. However, they do not want malpractice insurance rates to stifle medical practice and encourage defensive medical techniques that erode standards.

Patient Rights Protection Act

Despite the quality of medical care in Thailand, sometimes things go wrong. As a result, there are a number of regulations and procedures designed to protect patients in the event that they are harmed by negligent healthcare providers. A comprehensive understanding of the legal framework and the burden of proof is critical to pursuing a successful claim for damages.

Generally, a court examines whether a healthcare provider complied with the “reasonably expected standard of care.” This involves comparing the healthcare provider’s actions with those of their peers and industry standards. In addition, the burden of proof is upon the patient to show that their injuries were caused by a breach of the standard of care.

Patients also have the right to demand complete, current information about their medical treatment. This includes the risks involved in any proposed procedure, as well as information about previous treatments that have been successful or unsuccessful. However, patients must ensure that the request does not infringe on anyone else’s privacy.

Nevertheless, the health ministry is concerned that the tort system could decimate an already understaffed health system by forcing competent doctors to quit or switch professions due to fear of malpractice lawsuits. As a result, it has drafted legislation that would create a fund that compensates victims of medical malpractice. The money would come from donations from government run hospitals, private hospitals that wish to be covered, and patients who have paid for health insurance through the state-owned National Health Security Administration (NHSA). Compensation would then be distributed to the victims within two months of a complaint being filed.

Medical Council of Thailand

The Medical Council of Thailand is the principle government oversight body for doctors in the country. It keeps statistics regarding doctor misconduct and has a complaint procedure for patients who feel they are victims of malpractice. The Medical Council will investigate the claims to determine if, in its view, malpractice did indeed occur. Then, it will advise police of whether criminal proceedings should be initiated.

Malpractice in the country is typically defined as healthcare professionals failing to perform their duties in accordance with accepted standards of practice. It may involve misdiagnosis, surgical errors or prescription mistakes. In Thailand, malpractice claims are often filed by foreigners. However, there has recently been a growing movement in the country to introduce legislation that would make it easier for Thais to pursue compensation for medical mistakes.

The law outlines patient rights, including the right to receive safe and competent healthcare that meets accepted standards of care. Other important provisions include the right to informed consent and the right to be compensated if injured by negligence or other improper treatment. Informed consent involves providing patients with all of the necessary information regarding a proposed medical procedure, including its risks and benefits. Failure to inform a patient of potential risks can constitute battery or negligence, depending on the circumstances. Similarly, coercion is also considered battery and can be grounds for a medical malpractice claim.

Statute of Limitations

Medical malpractice cases in Thailand present unique challenges, both for patients seeking compensation and healthcare providers defending against claims. It is important to understand these challenges in order to navigate the process effectively.

In general, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims in Thailand is one year from the date of injury. However, this limit may be extended in certain circumstances.

If a patient feels that they have been the victim of a medical error, they can file a claim with the Medical Council. This body is responsible for regulating the medical profession in Thailand and investigating complaints of malpractice. It also keeps statistics on doctor misconduct.

The Medical Council can also impose disciplinary measures, including suspension or revocation of a physician’s license. However, the council has criticized for failing to investigate complaints quickly enough.

Compensation in a medical malpractice case in Thailand is determined by the court. It can include compensation for a patient’s medical expenses, loss of income, and pain and suffering. In addition, the court can award punitive damages in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct.

For foreigners who have been harmed by medical treatment in Thailand, a legal team with experience in Thai medical law can be essential. They can help you gather evidence and file a lawsuit in the appropriate court. They can also assist you in negotiating or settling your claim out of court.

Punitive Damages

Medical malpractice in Thailand is a complex issue that affects both patients and healthcare providers. For patients, it can be difficult to obtain compensation or accountability for medical errors, while healthcare providers face a number of challenges when defending against claims of malpractice. These include time limitations, complicated medical evidence, and proving negligence and causation.

Under Thai law, claims for medical malpractice are based on a combination of civil and criminal law, as well as professional regulations issued by the Medical Council of Thailand. Claims for compensation are filed in a civil court and must be brought within one year of the date of the injury, unless such claims also fall under the ambit of criminal law, in which case the period of prescription prescribed under the latter law will apply.

Claims for compensation in a medical malpractice case can include the cost of obtaining additional treatment to address any injuries resulting from the medical error, loss of income due to being unable to work, and punitive damages in cases of gross negligence or intentional misconduct. In addition, patients may also seek disciplinary action against the healthcare provider by filing a complaint with the Medical Council of Thailand. This can lead to a variety of penalties, including warnings, suspensions, and even revocation of a healthcare provider’s license.

LitigationConsultantLeave a comment

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik